If you were raised on radio and are of a certain age, then you probably remember the "power ballad." Much as I like the Beatles' "Hey Jude" and Bruce Springsteen's "Thunder Road," those songs are simply rock anthems that build to a crescendo. In my world, the power ballad was pioneered by Boston's "More Than a Feeling" in 1976 and the virtuoso-piano-overtaken-by-everything-else that Styx wove into "Come Sail Away" a year later. From those near-symphonic beginnings (for which we can thank Tom Scholz and Dennis DeYoung, respectively), the power ballad elbowed its way to prominence in the early Eighties.
I suspect that the power ballad's emergence was driven by admirers of Boston and Styx, and perhaps by FM radio programmers who talked other influential rockers into broadening their commercial appeal. Any such pitch could only have been reinforced when arena rock pioneers realized that speaker systems and amplifiers had improved enough that you didn't need rebel-without-a-cause lyrics to move a concert audience, because even flutes could be heard in the cheap seats. Eventually even "glam metal" and "hair" bands took a whack at the form.
Whatever the impetus for the once-formidable popularity of the power ballad, Scholz and DeYoung worked their songwriting alchemy to fuse singer/songwriter craftsmanship with spare-no-expense orchestration and "Wall of Sound" microphone placements cadged from Phil Spector. Bonnie Tyler (or, more accurately, her songwriter) noticed their work, and wailed all the way to the bank through a "Total Eclipse of the Heart." Not to be outdone, bands like Journey, REO Speedwagon, and Air Supply joined Boston and Styx in building lucrative careers on signature tunes like "Open Arms," "Can't Fight this Feeling," and "Making Love Out of Nothing at All."
Musical taste changes, and many of the original power ballads are seldom heard these days, not least because the bands that mastered the genre are either gone or playing now at Indian casinos and state fairs. But when the power ballad crawled off to die, it found a final resting place in so-called "Christian Rock."
Please understand that I do not share the cynicism that P.J. O'Rourke voiced so amusingly after hearing nothing but dreck on a visit to a Christian music store in Heritage USA more than twenty years ago: "No album was actually entitled 'I Found God And Lost My Talent,' but I'm quite sure that was an oversight," he wrote afterward, while transcribing notes from one of his "Holidays in Hell."
O'Rourke was too harsh, and too quick to dismiss everything in the offending music store as kitsch (although, in fairness, at Heritage USA in its heyday, the temptation to such an indictment must have been overwhelming).
Christian Rock has other critics, too, many of them pious and churchgoing. Some insist that the genre is a tool of Satan, and I do not agree with that, either. Mine is a faith in a triune God, and both acoustic and electric chords can echo the three-in-one unity by which Christian baptism initiates people into the church, with (if you'll pardon the elasticity of the metaphor) Father, Son, and Spirit being the original "power trio." I've said that before.
The problem with Christian Rock is it can now be found not just on the radio, but also in the "worship space." That, I do not get. Even the best of the Christian Rock songs (like the Juno-award winning "A Better Way," which is expertly covered by the LIFETEEN band at my own parish) can only be called power ballads. They are not hymns. And that is precisely my quarrel with singing them during a liturgy, even -- perhaps especially-- a liturgy targeted at teenagers.
To put the dilemma a little differently: many Christian churches have traded in choirs for "praise bands," and where praise bands go, power ballads are sure to follow-- even if you you don't join the estimable Lawrence Henry in disparaging praise bands as "whitebread" and "trite."
Catholic parishes were mercifully late to this development by comparison with Reform-minded Christian denominations. Some Protestants first embraced what my kids call "Jesus music" as an outreach tool untainted by the vaguely papist deference to hierarchy implied in the lyrics to such classic hymns as "Holy God We Praise Thy Name." Music directors who'd grown up listening to the Manhattan Transfer ask a telephone operator to "Get Me Jesus on the Line" may not have even been conscious of their own theological assumptions. They simply wanted to "reach people where they're at," and figured that grand old hymns had to go, if for no other reason than that they harkened back to the days of what singer/songwriter John Prine called "stained glass in every window, [and] hearing aids in every pew." Unfortunately, many Catholic parishes that were late to embrace the praise band phenomenon have been making up for lost time in this area.
The chain of events went something like this: First, the folk revival of the Sixties brought "Kumbaya" out from the campfire circle and into church service repertoire, leaving "Michael Row the Boat Ashore" to fend for itself among the Boy Scouts. Andrew Lloyd Weber and some other savvy secularists took a look at that phenomenon and replied via Broadway and the movies through "Jesus Christ, Superstar" and "Godspell," both of which were hits. Nobody managed to turn Jesus into a hippie icon, but that wasn't necessary for positive and negative reasons. On the positive side, Brother Sun, Sister Moon had done a heartwarming job of turning Saints Francis and Claire into flower children. On the negative side, the early Seventies already had a dugout full of icons, with everyone from Che Guevara to Sun Myung Moon stepping up to the plate.
When arena rock arrived to push folk musicians back to Berkeley and Greenwich Village or coffee houses dialed into those mother ships, the praise band subculture saw an opening and sprinted for it with instruments in tow. Musicians who had previously played sweltering summer concerts under revival tents near Igloo-brand coolers filled with sweet tea decided that enclosed sanctuary space was a better place to gig, not least because it had air conditioning.
Most churches had by then lost narrow naves as architects experimented with forms borrowed from theater-in-the-round, flattening Gothic, Baroque, Neo-classical and even Shaker-inspired prairie architecture into Sydney Opera House knockoffs or boxy-looking warehouse megachurches. One thing led to another, and with churches built more wide than high, it was fairly easy to fit a drum kit and maybe a Hammond organ up front near the pulpit. Choirs that had led the congregation in singing from the back of various churches moved forward too, but by then the instrumentalists had claimed all the good spots.
The praise band people meant well. They always do. But they envied the perennial esteem in which a capella gospel groups were held, and they'd drive to rehearsals listening to their commercially successful peers sanctify airwaves in subtle ways with catchy tunes like Norman Greenbaum's "Spirit in the Sky" and The Youngbloods' "Get Together," not to mention the Nitty Gritty Dirt Band's "Will the Circle Be Unbroken." Those tunes were great, but they were commercial, and the praise band people humming along in their cars would bless God for having giving them an opportunity to be less circumspect in their praise.
Most of the unknowns couldn't compete with the level of craftsmanship on FM radio, or were loath to persuade their pastors of the merits of things like the reverb pedal and fuzz bass, but that didn't keep them from trying to Rock for Jesus: it was easier than trying to master the old Gospel tunes still sung in predominantly black churches. If you questioned the praise band bias toward performance (as opposed to, say, reverence), the more scripturally literate band directors were quick to point out that in 2 Samuel, King David and all the Israelites danced before the Lord.
In Catholic circles, praise band relocation off the grass and onto the carpet was aided and abetted by liturgists hell-bent on democratizing and de-clericalizing everything about the Mass "in the spirit of Vatican II," and never mind what the actual architects of Vatican II (such as a Polish prelate named Karol Wojtyla who later became Pope John Paul II) had to say. Some of those liturgists worked hand-in-glove with politically correct composers --sons of Salieri, every one of them -- like the irksome Marty Haugen.
Now that praise bands are indoors, they have no intention of returning to the garages, basements, parking lots, and auditoriums from which they came.
As a result of the developments I've sketched above, and the fact that hymnody has fallen victim to the language wars, we now have a sorry situation indeed. But Anthony Esolen understands this phenomenon better than I do. Go read his comments at the link, and the classically literate followup to those comments. In brief, Esolen says that sentimentality, although valuable in its place, is neverthless destructive of genuine feeling. And there you have the problem put in yet another way: when power ballads intrude on the liturgy of heaven (which is what the Mass is), then what Esolen calls "the necessary hypocrisy of small talk" is wrongly raised to the status of a liturgical act.
Power ballad and praise band mediocrity is sometimes justified on the grounds that people need to be met "where they are" with lyrics to which they can relate. This attitude is arrogant on two counts, in that praise band directors have abrogated to themselves an outreach task that properly belongs to the Holy Spirit, while also assuming that straightforward hymnody of the kind exemplified in, for example, "We walk by faith / and not by sight / No gracious words we hear / Of Him who spoke as none e'er spoke / Yet we believe Him near" is somehow less intelligible than what you hear in pop music. Mr. Tom Petty, if you please: "All the vampires / Walking through the Valley / Move west down / Ventura Boulevard / And the bad boys / Are standing in the shadows / While the good girls / Are home with broken hearts. "
Show of hands as to how many people outside California know that Petty is singing about the San Fernando Valley? And how about those vampires, hmmm....? (Bueller? Anyone?)
Like C.S. Lewis wrote in a related context, we need meat, not just milk. Lewis wasn't writing specifically to Catholics at the time, but that he should have to remind Christians whose faith lives are ordered around the eucharist of this fact is testimony to our own failures and the failures of some of our pastors.
Friday, June 29, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

17 comments:
Excellent post! :-)
Wow, Patrick, what a great post!
And to top off such a great post comes news that the Holy Father has disseminated his much-anticipated motu proprio to representatives of several episcopal conferences in Rome, a document that frees the use of the traditional pre-Vatican-II Roman liturgy throughout the world. Praise God, perhaps this will finally start the church on a path back to liturgical sanity, and the concomitant replacement of man-centric power ballads with God-centric hymns!
I'm pasing this on to my pastor. Thank you Patrick.
This is fantastic. Thanks for tying all these ideas together. It's informative, thought-provoking.
And humbling.
I read your blog and think I should just close down my amateur little blatherings and maybe take up coloring by numbers.
From your piece, you'd think that Jesus and his disciples sat around singing "A Mighty Fortress is Our God." I love old hymns but, so long as the lyrics are theologically sound, I see no reason to quarrel with modern music. It seems that your only argument is that you don't like the style of contermporary Christian music. No problem, but recognize that this is simply your personal taste and means nothing to those who do not share your disaffection.
Dave, you misunderstood me. First, Jesus and his disciples wouldn't have been sitting around singing a Lutheran hymn. More importantly, I have no quarrel with modern music. Note that the hymn lyrics I contrasted with a verse from Tom Petty's "Free Falling" are not centuries old. I do, though, stand with Pope Benedict in saying that the kind of music used with liturgy is important, and the praise band repertoire is typically man-centered rather than God-centered. "I wanna praise you Lord" is the aural equivalent of looking in the mirror; "Now Thank We All Our God" is not.
Well said Sir!
Brian Whalen, Los Angeles, CA (With the WORST masses and music in the world!)
Actually I'd marked this down to come back and read :p
You must be psychic. Last week I was going to write about the old Rejoice folk mass - am I the only one who remembers that? I guess that dates me. And the Singing Nun, and the whole 60s and 70s movement to make the liturgy and worship more 'relevant'. A lot of it was hokey but it did bring some life into the church. I was reminded of all that when driving home late at night I heard that song, "I will praise you in this storm", which just absolutely blew me away. I don't normally care for that sort of thing, but it really took my breath away.
I miss a lot of that. I tend to prefer formalism in church but I also love sunrise mass the times I remember feeling closest to God have invariably been when I've been out of doors, either on retreat or at early morning services with just a few people when camping. Not sure why.
I actually attended a "generic" christian service where "I wanna know what love is" was sung as a worship song. Yeah. I didn't think it cut the mustard.
Are you thinking of the WOW and Vineyard type worships songs/repetoire? It has been a while since I went to an contemporary pentecostal worship service, but in my day, our youth group worship band was echoing the the sound of pearl jam and nirvana (I quite liked it) both vocally and musically.
Great post, Patrick. I just linked to you. Three Persons in Three Chords: Jesus at the Wall of Sound: Extra points to Patrick for referencing both the first band I ever saw in concert (Styx, Boston Garden, c. 1977) and the word 'hymnody' in the same post--and having it all make sense. As far as 'Christian rock' goes, one of my favorite bands (Creed) cagily eschews the label...
You know, its interesting that we finite insignificant little humans seem to have somehow figured out what kind of music God "PREFERS". Thats fascinating! Do you really suppose God, The ALPHA and the OMEGA, is up there going "OH yeah! I like that one better than that other one!" Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating for any one particular style. All I know is I've seen some real holy wars happen because some people thought they knew what God almighty's musical tastes are. I am Catholic to the bone. I grew up on Styx and Boston and AC DC and ...... I love some of the contemporary worship stuff. I love old hyms accompanied by the organ when they are done well. I think Gregorian chant is beautiful and would love to attend a service where it was done well. In other words I would love to share. I'll come to a service with Gregorian chant if you will let me bring in the drums and electric guitar and do something a little more contemporary once and a while. Maybe I've got the bible all wrong but isn't it more about sharing than one group trying to legislate their preference (oops I'm mean GOD'S preference) upon everyone else.
Hymnody isn't about reading God's mind to figure out what He prefers; it's about how to best worship Him (rather than ourselves or our own needs) in song. The Bible isn't just "about sharing," either (cf The Sermon on the Mount, which Pope Benedict calls "The Torah of the Messiah," and the Lord's Prayer).
The last time I looked it takes human beings-flawed creatures all of us-to accomplish worship.
In my twenty plus years involvement in liturgical music (including five years which I spent at the Franciscan University of Steubenville) I have seen humans sing hymns and all sorts of traditional stuff with all kinds of ego and 'holier than thou' kind of condescension in the same way that I've seen the contemporary musicians (myself included) sing with too much pride and arrogance. So are you still trying to tell me in the midst of all of this-we all "see through a glass darkly"-that you or somebody else can genuinely determine what is the "best way to worship God"? Or perhaps your saying that God has revealed what is the best way to worship him to a certain elite group??? I know that he asks us to worship Him "in Spirit and in Truth." I've seen that done and experienced God's presence in many different genres of music. I will say that I've heard some types of Christian music that does nothing for me (Christian rap) but I do not believe for a moment that my dislike is indicative of God's heart. If the young man/woman who is singing it has just been rescued from a life of drugs and violence and he/she is pouring out deep heart felt gratitude then I'd bet my soul that God is all ears. Yet isn't it funny that if this young persons rap song were being sung in mass you know what kind of pious huff you'd get from so many daily mass-goers. How they'd all run to Father and to parish council and demand that they never hear such an abomination in the sanctuary again. Like the pharisee who was scandalized by the woman who washed Jesus feet with her tears and her hair, I think we miss the HEART of the matter.
An Arlington (Virginia) Catholic Herald article covered the range of liturgical music available in the diocese. A diocesan music coordinator was quoted as saying, "This is not about the music. It’s about praising God. There’s room for all of it in our Church." Whatever the musical style, I agree with your point about keeping it focused on God and not ourselves.
Good article, better than most. I am a musician, music teacher and liturgist with 40 years experience. People used to complain to me that all rock music was evil; "It is an evil beat!" My response was to ask them to define what the evil tempo and rhythm patterns are so I could mark them out of my books and metronomes. Now I read much of the demands that we all sing only Gregorian chant or a very narrow group of pre-approved hymns. What bunk!
My job as a liturgist and musician is to lead the people in worship. The musicians are not here to 'perform' but we do try to sound good. I avoid music that is overly sentimental and lyrics that are meaningless. So many people have complained about "the organ is too loud" at so-and-so church, and "they keep singing the same four old hymns," etc.
The reality of liturgical music is that there is good and bad in every genre. Every composer has good and bad songs. Every hymnal, songbook, etc. There are no simple solutions. We as musicians do the best we can with the gifts God has given us. If you can only worship God if the music and liturgical rite are just one way, then you are just like all of the other people that wander church to church, seeking one that suits them.
Nice job describing the grotesque stuff we sing at Mass. I'm a convert from conservative evangelicalism. We had "choruses" (to be sung at camp, at youth meetings, on the Bible Bus, etc) and "hymns" which were for Sunday service. Catholics don't seem to get the difference. My all-time most hated "praise" song begins "I The Lord of Sea and Sky..." Excuse me. Theology 101 teaches us clearly that "God is God and I am NOT." I refuse to sing this song. It feels like blasphemy.
Fantastic post. You've articulately expressed many of the reasons for my own distaste for "praise music."
Another is the dropoff in quality. Part of that is the text of the hymns, which other writers, like Lawrence Henry at the American Spectator, have also addressed. But my concerns about quality also extend to the level of musicianship.
Being a professional musician myself, I realize I'm more sensitive to out-of-tune instruments and singing, bad diction and cheeseball pop-music devices (e.g., "scooping" into notes) inserted into church music. But I don't know if I'm really elitist here, or simply in a position to be more specific about what bugs me. I trust the ordinary churchgoer recognizes quality as well. And it begs the question: Whatever the instrumentation, whichever the hymn, are we striving to offer God our very best?
But my greatest concern is when the musical "show" hijacks the natural flow of the Mass. Particularly as Catholics, we're there for the Blessed Sacrament, not a concert. The music is an aid to worship, not the center of it.
And, the order of the Mass itself has a "rhythm" to it that, even in vernacular languages since Vatican II, speaks of centuries of tradition, and a unity of practice with Masses offered across the world.
Besides, a little silence never killed anyone: every moment doesn't have to be filled with sound or activity (our attention spans aren't that shot yet, I hope).
Post a Comment