Friday, July 17, 2009

The perks of Korean Cultural Camp

The kids made mandoo (dumplings) and the adults were treated to a chef's lesson in how to prepare bibimbap, but I still like the melon bars best.

A better way to think of eternity

"Eternity does not stand by the side of time, quite unrelated to it; it is the creatively supporting power of all time, which encompasses passing time in its own present and thus gives it the ability to be. It is not timelessness, but dominion over time. As the Today that is contemporary with all ages, it can also make its influence felt in any age."

also:

"God is not the prisoner of his eternity; in Jesus he has time --for us, and Jesus is thus in actual fact the 'throne of grace' to which at any time we can "with confidence draw near." (Heb. 4:16)

Both quotes are from Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger's Introduction to Christianity.

You're welcome.

Silver linings

Things have been crazy busy around the Paragraph Farm lately, and we're still running a multitude of errands associated with accident recovery, including trying to get a replacement car squared away, and talking with insurance adjustors, doctors, physical therapists, etc.

Fortunately, Greg Kandra has good, amazingly little-known stuff up about Apollo 11 (Buzz Aldrin was carrying the Reserved Sacrament? Whoa, Nelly!). He also captured Senator Tom Coburn's cogent remarks about the "schizophrenic rule of the law" that got that way out of misplaced deference to the sentiments of abortion lobbyists.

Elsewhere in the parts of the blogosphere I visit regularly, the Anchoress starts a disconcerting catchall post with the pointed observation that President Obama intends to have more czars than Baskin-Robbins has ice cream flavors (the analogy is mine, not hers, but I bet you know what I mean).

Sister Toldjah is still knocking them out of the park. She almost always does. "Forced sterilization fruitcake?" That's funny and accurate. I wish I'd thought of it!

We need people like ST around and blogging brilliantly because otherwise the president and his acolytes (yes, that's exactly what they are) would have unfettered access to the dictionaries they've already abused even more than most politicians do.

David Warren has a useful column out discussing this scenario in terms of "earthlings" and "martians." He also doffs a cap to Sarah Palin's recent and feisty op-ed against the president's "cap and trade" energy initiatives.

(When somebody at The Atlantic carps that "Palin wrote a 700-word takedown of cap-and-trade that did not include the words pollution, emissions, carbon, or global warming," then you know she hit a nerve. Why the Atlantic guy thinks those omissions weakened her piece, I don't know. I'd trust her take on global warming more than his).

On a more delicious (chocolate-covered) note, Happy Friday. I'm looking forward to the "accidental chocolate" (at the link) that "could be in shops within two years," thanks to the ingenuity of Swiss food scientists.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Kimchee, Bulgogi, and Banana Pudding

Everything in the post title was on the dinner menu tonight at a day camp in Raleigh sponsored by a local Korean Christian association (Truth to tell, Banana Pudding and Dr. Pepper go with almost anything south of the Mason-Dixon line). Thomas and Jane had attended only one day of the same camp last year, but this year we signed them up for the full gig.

Yes, Jane can go to day camp, too! Camp activity does not appear to involve concentrating on any one thing over an extended period. Hooray!

She's not allowed to jump around, but she can play running games with other children if she's careful. She's been good about wearing a baseball cap to protect the suture lines in her head whenever she's outdoors.

Earlier this week, the full-length cast on her right arm was changed out for a short cast that protects only her forearm and wrist. The bonus (besides Jane being able to flex her right elbow again) is that the cast is waterproof.

Book Review: West Oversea

West Oversea, by Lars Walker (Noble Novels 2009) has more than its share of magic, and at first, I thought Walker was cheating. Would the Eye of Odin that Father Aillil is asked to dispose of in approximately the Year of Our Lord 1002 become as troublesome a bauble as the Ring of Power that nearly up-ended J.R.R. Tolkien's Middle Earth? Would the blood and iron proper to a Viking saga take a back seat to psychological adventures of the kind written by Ursula K. Le Guin? Might a promising tale shipwreck on the iceberg of "magical realism" where Gabriel Garcia Marquez reclines with the tote bag he got from a pledge drive on National Public Radio?

I need not have worried. Without quite rising to "Gates of Fire" levels, Walker delivers the goods. Scandinavian mythology plays an important role in this novel, but like the late Tony Hillerman did for Navajo detectives in the American Southwest, Walker uses otherworldly elements (such as a shape-shifting villain) to shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of his characters, most prominently Father Aillil, the Irish priest who narrates the story, and his friend Erling Skjalgsson, chief man of west Norway.

This chronicle of a voyage that ranges from Norway to Iceland, Greenland, and the hitherto-uncharted lands that would later become parts of Canada is set in motion by two things: Erling's unusual willingness to peacefully surrender most of his landholdings to a rival with a stronger (by dint of battle and inheritance) claim, and Fr. Aillil's ardent wish to find and free his enslaved sister Maeve (she's a thrall, actually, but "enthralled" does not have the meaning it once did).


Walker adeptly uses several characters to describe the tug-of-war between pagan and Christian (Catholic) impulses throughout Northern Europe in that era.

Although West Oversea is part of a series of novels that Walker calls "romances" in the older sense of the term, it can also be enjoyed by people whose only previous exposure to Vikings in fiction comes from the more-determinedly-secular stories of Bernard Cornwell. Some previous exposure to Vikings in literature provides a useful yardstick for measuring how well Walker succeeds as a historical novelist, which in my opinion is well enough to belong to the "A" team, a little shy of Jeff Schaara, but shoulder-to-shoulder with Ellis Peters and her Brother Cadfael boooks.

I chuckled at the artistry of one scene where Father Aillil's German bishop mocks the Irish priest's uncertain grasp of ecclesiastical protocol by saying that "It took you Irish long enough to learn the proper date for Easter and how to shave a decent tonsure." In a response that only readers are privileged to hear, Fr. Aillil thinks, "I might have replied that the Irish brought the faith to the Germans, but I thought it wiser to hold my tongue."

Per the dictates of medieval hospitality and the rigors of sail-powered travel in the North Atlantic at the turn of the first Christian millenium, Walker's characters spend more of the story ashore than at sea, but he handles geographical and maritime detail as deftly as he handles the finer points of combat in a shield wall. The relationship between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law is a main theme of this novel, and that, too, is handled well, with unforced philosophizing sandwiched between home truths like "A man is known by the greatness of his foes," and "The law is like a sword; it can be well- or ill-balanced."

My criticisms of the book are minor. It does not rise to epic levels, but only because Walker did not aim that high. Beyond that, the women in this story have little to do. One might also argue that there are more characters throughout the narrative than necessary, although Walker has wit enough to make the tangle of relationships a running joke for his Irish priest, who lets his own exasperation with Icelandic focus on geneology show several times. Moreover, Walker and his editors do identify key character names and relationships in a helpful list that appears where a preface would be.

Quibbles aside, if the measure of an author is the literary company he keeps, I can't remember another book review of mine that name-checked such an all-star writing team. It's not often that any one author is refreshingly original enough to evoke comparisons to Le Guin, Hillerman. Cornwell, Schaara, and Peters, especially because most of them never sat on a bench in a Viking hall telling sea stories. I hope it's plain that Walker ranks with fast company, and West Oversea is more than good enough to make me want to read his other work. Erling is an honest merchant who can also fight, and Father Aillil, though frequently seasick, is excellent company. You'll want to follow them around, and cheer them on.

(N.B: The original version of this post incorrectly referred to William Goldman as a writer of historical fiction, but on reflection, I realize that the novel I had in mind while thinking of him belongs to the fantasy or "alternate history" genre).

Monday, July 13, 2009

Sic transit gloria mundi

Back in 2005, I linked from a post here to the online (White House) archive of a speech that then-president Bush made to Naval Academy cadets at Annapolis, Md. The president was talking then about American efforts to support Iraqi currency.

The link worked at the time, but much of what the previous administration did in Iraq has apparently been consigned to offline archives, because
www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/Iraq/iraq_strategy_nov2005.html now yields this Obamanian boilerplate:

"The President arrived facing an unprecedented array of challenges, and has met them with a bold, comprehensive plan. He passed the most ambitious recovery package in history to address the economic crisis. He kept faith with the American people through a government that is open, transparent, and accountable. And he restored America's alliances abroad, as well as our American values here at home."


That strikes me as an oddly self-congratulatory statement, notable for its past tense (when, exactly, did President Obama keep faith with the American people?), its lack of nuance, and its cloying assumption that American alliances and values were both in the dumpster before a junior Senator from Illinois came along to salvage them. Other people have already disposed of that vaunted "transparency" canard. "Sunshine before signing" bills into law went the way of the dodo bird (of course), not just once, but "six ways from Sunday," as it were.

As to spackle or structural work on American alliances...hmmm...Abet the French in snubbing the queen of England for D-Day celebrations? That was an exercise in "alliance restoration." Meddle for the wrong people in Honduras? Send terrorists to Palau? Give Gordon Brown DVDs he can't watch? Same deal.

I suspect that verbiage on the White House web site is not so much a selective documentary record of executive branch doings as it was under previous administrations with a Web presence, but a warehouse full of phrases for various flunkies to use in crafting mendacious op-eds that support Obama policies.

(Jack Cashill, Robert Stacy McCain, and other pundits who enjoy a well-turned phrase keep pointing out that our president is perhaps a competent writer but by no stretch of the imagination a good writer. Sadly, few people seem to listen).

The mendacity is not alone. Somebody is sure to pipe up about how erstwhile Vice President Dick Cheney lied to Congress, as he may well have done (though the case against him is weak). Lying is something every politician has at least passable skill at, and most political appointees -- like John Holdren -- also learn. But the administration that waltzed into power selling "hope and change" as the preferred alternative to a "more of the same" ticket topped by a not-all-that-Republican candidate has raised (or lowered) the bar to levels that liars like Richard Nixon could only dream of.

This willingness to play fast and loose with the truth is not confined to foreign affairs, where President Obama just tried to rewrite the history of the Cold War in front of a Russian audience.

I question some of President Obama's high-profile hires, including Holdren, Jennifer Daskal, Steven Rattner, and vocabulary-challenged Supreme Court nominee Sotomayor, she of the "muddled and confusing" testimony.

Sober-minded pastors, economists like Brad Delong from reliable bastions of Democratic support (Berkeley, for crying out loud), and small business owners are also scratching their heads over this administration's economic and health care reform policies. The administration itself is pretending it never promised everybody a full and free cookie jar.

If you missed the discussion at HotAir on the difference between OODA loops and PIDDLE loops as it relates to the president's preferred governing style, it's a must-read. There's more to what Obama does than "Why can't I just eat my waffle?," but -- sadly -- not a lot more.

Did you know that the number of U.S. companies in the world's top 500 is now at its lowest level ever? Has anybody asked Robert Gibbs or his boss to explain why? Personally, I want to hear what "Sheriff Joe" Biden says-- that's almost guaranteed to be blog fodder!

(the original post has been updated with more hyperlinks as evidence to buttress the assertions here continues to roll in)

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Healing things and museum movie fun

Jane just made the medically-approved transition from prescription antibiotic to an over-the-counter substitute applied externally. She's also been a good sport about those few times I've cut vitamin E capsules in half to apply the gel inside to the suture lines on her head, although she's sure that the gel involved is really "fish poop."

Cathleen and Thomas went to the aquarium in Myrtle Beach for some overdue mother-son time together. Left to our own devices awhile, Jane and I treated ourselves to gelato and a movie. The movie was Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian, and we both recommend it as a lot of fun.

I liked this movie even more than the original Night at the Museum, because Amy Adams makes an adorable Amelia Earhart. Hank Azaria as the Egyptian ruler Kahmunrah, and Bill Hader as General George Armstrong Custer, are also fun to watch. Jane's favorite scenes involved Albert Einstein bobble-heads.

Professional reviewers have not been especially kind to this movie. I think most of them have been too long in the saddle. At least the LA Times critic noticed that Adams' patter and delivery made her sound
sometimes like a sweeter version of the young Katharine Hepburn.

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Hägar the Not-So-Horrible?

I'm thinking of Dik Browne's comic strip warrior rather than Abraham's second wife, because Lars Walker suggests that American law owes more to Hägar and his seafaring kind from Norway and Denmark than is commonly acknowledged.

Thursday, July 09, 2009

Book Review: Thank God Ahead of Time

Thank God Ahead of Time: The Life and Spirituality of Solanus Casey is an engaging biography of the humble Capuchin friar and Wisconsin native likely to become the first canonized male saint born in the United States. Author Michael H. Crosby, himself a Capuchin friar, has done his homework on Casey (1870 – 1957).

This biography –- now in its third edition -– describes the arc of Casey’s life in only 256 pages. Crosby quotes often from Casey’s correspondence, and sprinkles his narrative with anecdotes gleaned from interviews with those who knew him, not least the Capuchin author and EWTN mainstay, Fr. Benedict Groeschel.

In the pages of this bioography, we meet a pious Catholic of Irish descent who worked as a streetcar conductor and prison guard before entering religious life. Crosby suggests that Casey’s alleged intellectual deficits were not significant, and probably had much to do with the difficulty that almost any speaker of American English would have when studying theology in German and Latin rather than in his native tongue. Excerpts from Casey’s correspondence bolster that assertion, because Casey’s writing is straightforward, although more verbose than we are accustomed to seeing three generations later, when people tweet each other and the postal service looks for ways to close underperforming branch offices.

Any man who plays the fiddle for Jesus in front of the Blessed Sacrament at what others might call “ungodly” hours, as Casey did throughout Capuchin Franciscan friaries of New York, Michigan, and Indiana, is a man after my own heart.

Casey’s “mystic in action” approach to life involved total surrender to Christ. Accordingly, Casey was also an instrument of many healing miracles for the people around him, which Crosby treats in a refreshingly matter-of-fact way. Casey also worked miracles after his death, including at least one that
Amy Welborn’s late husband blogged movingly about.

Crosby does a good job of describing Casey’s enthusiasm for enrolling people in the Seraphic Mass Association to support Capuchin missions. He also notes that Casey was a great fan of the devotional writings of
the original “Blue Nun,” Mary of Agreda, (d. 1665). In fact, the English translation of Mary of Agreda’s Mystical City of God made such a positive first impression that over the course of his life, Casey nearly memorized that biography of the mother of Jesus by one of her namesakes.

You may be wondering if Crosby’s affectionate portrait of Casey has any flaws, and the answer is yes, Thank God Ahead of Time drags in some places. This occasional want of craft would be surprising, given that Crosby has more than a dozen other books to his credit, but when writing about Solanus Casey, the temptation to hagiography over which Crosby sometimes trips is understandable. Crosby sugarcoats Casey’s fierce opposition to anti-Irish policies of the British government, and struggles with mid-century (pre-Vatican II) Catholic piety. His detachment from that sensibility is evident, for example, in the awkwardness with which he notes that Capuchins used to observe the custom of kissing the floor whenever they crossed the space in front of a tabernacle.

Anyone who has not read masterworks like Donald Spoto’s Reluctant Saint: The Life of Francis of Assisi and Peter Ackroyd’s The Life of Thomas More might be more forgiving of the lapses that keep Thank God Ahead of Time from having the same “you are there” feel that classic biographies of the first rank do.

The best feature of Thank God Ahead of Time is a thirty-page chapter on the spirituality of Solanus Casey that closes the book. This alloy of Franciscan charism and Casey's own outlook is (as the book title implies) a simple spirituality of profound gratitude, and there is much there for any Christian to emulate.

Crosby hits a double rather than a home run. But in spite of its leisurely pacing and now-you-see-it, now-you-don't detatchment, this is a biography that I will happily share with the other members of a bible study group to which I belong, and I do recommend it.

Warm smell of colitas rising up through the air?

Iowahawk sends a dispatch from the "funeral for California."

I like his thought of Nevada and Oregon as "band mates" for the Golden State.

If the post title rings a (mission) bell, then you'll also like this explication from Cecil "Straight Dope" Adams.

Wednesday, July 08, 2009

My whippersnapper

Thomas and I were playing with the satellite radio in a rental car. On the All Elvis station (yes, there is one), he said, "So why was this guy famous again?" But then we heard Jerry Lee Lewis burning through an arpeggio on the "Classic Vinyl" station, and Thomas let go with a "Hmmm...Good piano playing!"

Weigel rarely but now really wrong

Damian Thompson says George Weigel's reaction to Caritas in Veritate is intemperate and arrogant. I like Weigel's writing most of the time, but Thompson is absolutely right.

Thompson quotes from a
very helpful analysis in the Catholic Herald ("Pope Benedict puts God at the heart of globalisation"), and then notes that we readers are free to decide whether the Herald analysis is more accurate than Weigel's.

Thompson also explains why Weigel has earned his own pique:

"But what does annoy me is Weigel’s repeated insistence that the good bits of Caritas in Veritate reflect Pope Benedict’s thinking, while the clunky social justice material was imposed on him:

(quoting Wiegel) Benedict XVI, a truly gentle soul, may have thought it necessary to include in his encyclical these multiple off-notes, in order to maintain the peace within his curial household.

(Thompson's rejoinder) That is incredibly patronising to the Holy Father. How does Weigel know? And how dare he accuse Benedict XVI -- a Pope who has bravely grappled with a crisis of worship neglected by his liturgically tone-deaf predecessor -- of what amounts to intellectual cowardice?"

Good for Thompson for calling Weigel on that arrogance. And as a commentator whose nom de plume is Athanasius says following Thompson's essay, "I can’t help feeling that Weigel rushed out his piece without giving the encyclical careful consideration. Surely a closer reading reveals that the Pope’s arguments transcend exactly what Weigel is complaining about?"

Commentator Terry adds helpful advice: "Calm down, everybody, Pope Benedict has not sold out to the Left."


UPDATE: I also like what The Anchoress has to say about the encyclical.